Sunday, September 28, 2014
Cameron Russell: Looks aren't everything. Believe me, I'm a model
I love this video... I love this video SOO much...
I love it because when I first watched it, I was at a very impressionable stage in my life. A time when every time I looked in the mirror I picked at what I saw. I picked about what I saw so much that I hated everything that I saw. When I looked at other people I picked them apart. I judged myself on them and I rated myself. I had the world set out in two groups of people. People that were better than me and people that I saw myself on par with.
It was an incredibly twisted way of viewing the world, and I would feel guilty while I was doing it. I kept telling myself that I didn't want to be this superficial person. That I looks didn't matter. And they don't. Personality matters so much more.
Except, even though I knew that. It didn't stop me from wanting what I saw in other people. It didn't stop the crushing jealousy I felt (and still feel), when I see someone pulling off an outfit that I love and that I could NEVER pull off, and never will because of my body type and shape.
I thought that world was unfair, I felt like the victim and my own mind and way of perception was the bully.
I used to wonder if everyone felt like this... and I guess to a certain extent at some points in peoples lives they do.
When I saw this video, I felt inspired. I felt empowered. I looked in the mirror and tried to see the whole picture and not pick at imperfections.
It taught me a lot about how to view myself, and spoke about a topic that I am very passionate about.
I'm not saying that I'm always happy when I step on the scales now. Not even close. But this video, and ones like it meant that sometimes when I look in the mirror I smile.
And even though that's not a lot. It is still more than before
Labels:
beauty,
confidence,
empower,
girls,
insecure,
personal,
review,
self image,
TED talks,
women,
youtube
Sunday, September 7, 2014
In Defense of the Fluffy Romance Novels
Okay, I think this may turn into a series of blog posts. There are many things I need to address in my writings to defend the "fluffy romance." I myself am an avid reader of fluffy romance novels. I have read more than I care to count and I want no longer to be one of those people who shamefully hang their heads when asked what they read.
Why is it that so many people say that Pride and Prejudice is their favourite book? I'll tell you why, be cause it is an acceptable response (it is also quite a good book). It's a response that people won't scoff at. Sure you can love any contemporary indie novel that you like, but if you happen to enjoy a light funny romance book, then you're shallow and have no taste? I'm sorry but that's bullshit.
So I'm going to address some of the main arguments that people have against romance novels.
The first thing I want to talk about is when people say that romance books are predictable. OF BLOODY COURSE they are predictable. Life is predicable. I am a person and I can guess at how life will work out in certain situations. People are confusing predictable with realistic of the situation. Also they always say they can tell what's going to happen with the plot and how they are going to end up together, the whole point of a romance novel is that they end up together... just saying.
Now, I want to move on to the polar opposite: that romance books are completely unrealistic, that this doesn't happen to anyone in normal life. Again, you are reading fiction. If you dislike situations that arn't about to occur in real life then don't read fictional novels. These are romance novels and their target audiences are people who enjoy romance and love the utter impossibility and confidence that this type of love can exist... even if only in an authors imagination.
There are millions of types of books out there and just a moment ago (literally just a moment ago) my friend asked me what her favourite books were and I said Spellbound, (by Cara Lynn Shultz, REALLY good teenage romance book) and she said no, "that looks lame" I know for a fact that she loved that book, that we fangirled over that book for weeks... but she can't even post it on Facebook that she likes it because it's lame and everyone is posting "adult books."
Screw that for a joke, I strongly dislike those literary snobs who judge people on what novels they read, well at least they read! Unlike so many my age.....
.
..
...
So really got on a rant there, anyway I'll post more in defense of the fluffy romance later, have a nice week,
M xx
Why is it that so many people say that Pride and Prejudice is their favourite book? I'll tell you why, be cause it is an acceptable response (it is also quite a good book). It's a response that people won't scoff at. Sure you can love any contemporary indie novel that you like, but if you happen to enjoy a light funny romance book, then you're shallow and have no taste? I'm sorry but that's bullshit.
So I'm going to address some of the main arguments that people have against romance novels.
The first thing I want to talk about is when people say that romance books are predictable. OF BLOODY COURSE they are predictable. Life is predicable. I am a person and I can guess at how life will work out in certain situations. People are confusing predictable with realistic of the situation. Also they always say they can tell what's going to happen with the plot and how they are going to end up together, the whole point of a romance novel is that they end up together... just saying.Now, I want to move on to the polar opposite: that romance books are completely unrealistic, that this doesn't happen to anyone in normal life. Again, you are reading fiction. If you dislike situations that arn't about to occur in real life then don't read fictional novels. These are romance novels and their target audiences are people who enjoy romance and love the utter impossibility and confidence that this type of love can exist... even if only in an authors imagination.
There are millions of types of books out there and just a moment ago (literally just a moment ago) my friend asked me what her favourite books were and I said Spellbound, (by Cara Lynn Shultz, REALLY good teenage romance book) and she said no, "that looks lame" I know for a fact that she loved that book, that we fangirled over that book for weeks... but she can't even post it on Facebook that she likes it because it's lame and everyone is posting "adult books."Screw that for a joke, I strongly dislike those literary snobs who judge people on what novels they read, well at least they read! Unlike so many my age.....
.
..
...
So really got on a rant there, anyway I'll post more in defense of the fluffy romance later, have a nice week,
M xx
Labels:
authors,
blog,
Book review,
books,
chick-flicks,
culture,
fiction,
fluffy,
literature,
read,
reading,
realistic fiction,
rom-com,
romance,
well-read,
write
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Youtube Culture
I really got into youtube about a year and a half ago. I started with Jenna Marbles and then moved on to Zoella, and then to the rest of her friends affectionately named "The British Invasion."
At first I just watched the main channel beauty videos, but as these internet sensations rose to stardom their videos became less and less about what they started out about and more into the relationships and collabs with their friends.
Let me set this straight: I am not complaining.
I love these youtubers, they make me happy when I'm sad and they make my day so much lighter. However I feel that lately I've been relying on their "perfect lives" a bit too much. The viewers seem to forget that these people are human and that when you watch their daily vlogs that you are only seeing 10 MINUTES OF THEIR DAY.
That's ten minutes! that's nothing, I spend more than ten minutes in the shower and that is all you are seeing of their day. Yet during these vlogs you feel like you get to know them, they have conversations with you and you get to know parts of their personalities, and to you it can feel like you would be such good friends. There are probably five million other people who feel they would be best friends with the entire british invasion.
We see ten minutes of their day and feel like we know them so well, but if I were to walk up to them and say hello. They would have no idea I even exist.... doesn't that seem weird to you?
I've never been one to have serious celebrity crushes. It's just so weird that I feel like I know sooo much about them (in reality I don't) and that they don't have any idea who I am or what my life is like.
It feels weird that I can spend an entire day watching their lives and not doing anything with mine... it's kind of sad actually.
I realise for a lot of people that these videos are an escape, they are for me too. It's just that while they are fun and while they make you happy, people need to realise that they only show a very limited amount of themselves. They don't have videos where they bitch about other YouTubers, you don't see their faults.
It is not possible for a person to have NO FAULTS. There is not group of friends in the world where no one is annoyed by ANYTHING another person does.
So while YouTube does offer a utopian get-a-way I think it's important to realise that their lives are not our lives, and that the life you watch them have is basically them having a good time with friends who they love and friends who they play games with. Once you take away the fans and the videos and the fact that they all have amazingly white teeth. Then they are all just human.
And guess what?
So are you.
At first I just watched the main channel beauty videos, but as these internet sensations rose to stardom their videos became less and less about what they started out about and more into the relationships and collabs with their friends.
Let me set this straight: I am not complaining.
I love these youtubers, they make me happy when I'm sad and they make my day so much lighter. However I feel that lately I've been relying on their "perfect lives" a bit too much. The viewers seem to forget that these people are human and that when you watch their daily vlogs that you are only seeing 10 MINUTES OF THEIR DAY.
That's ten minutes! that's nothing, I spend more than ten minutes in the shower and that is all you are seeing of their day. Yet during these vlogs you feel like you get to know them, they have conversations with you and you get to know parts of their personalities, and to you it can feel like you would be such good friends. There are probably five million other people who feel they would be best friends with the entire british invasion.
We see ten minutes of their day and feel like we know them so well, but if I were to walk up to them and say hello. They would have no idea I even exist.... doesn't that seem weird to you?
I've never been one to have serious celebrity crushes. It's just so weird that I feel like I know sooo much about them (in reality I don't) and that they don't have any idea who I am or what my life is like.
It feels weird that I can spend an entire day watching their lives and not doing anything with mine... it's kind of sad actually.
I realise for a lot of people that these videos are an escape, they are for me too. It's just that while they are fun and while they make you happy, people need to realise that they only show a very limited amount of themselves. They don't have videos where they bitch about other YouTubers, you don't see their faults.
It is not possible for a person to have NO FAULTS. There is not group of friends in the world where no one is annoyed by ANYTHING another person does.
So while YouTube does offer a utopian get-a-way I think it's important to realise that their lives are not our lives, and that the life you watch them have is basically them having a good time with friends who they love and friends who they play games with. Once you take away the fans and the videos and the fact that they all have amazingly white teeth. Then they are all just human.
And guess what?
So are you.
![]() |
| I do not own this image (as if that wasn't obvious) |
Thursday, August 7, 2014
Girl with a Pearl Earring
So today I want to write this blog entry in two parts, the first is a review of the book, Girl with a Pearl Earring by Tracy Chevalier and the second on the movie they made of the book.
So part one:
When I was in year eight, my english teacher came up to me during a period called Wider Reading (basically a lesson spent getting books suggested to us and then choosing a book and reading for the rest of the lesson). My teacher approached me and took me to the senior fiction and pulled out a stack of books for me to read. One of them was Girl with a Pearl Earring, sadly I made the unfortunate decision to read the book Possession by A. S. Byatt first, not a great decision on my part as this book put me off all books of that nature. I gave up after about 300 pages on snail paced supposed romance. I then made an even worse by my choosing Wuthering Heights as my next book (one of the most depressing novels I have ever in my life attempted to read) and soon gave up after about 200 pages.
Sadly, I never decided to read Girl with a Pearl Earring that year, but perhaps it was a good thing because I'm not sure I would have enjoyed it the same way if I had read when I was fourteen.
When I picked up this book again from my school library I was looking for something "literary," I felt like something that would challenge me a little, but still something I would enjoy. So I chose that book, and surprising I really enjoyed it.
The story line was gentle, it was nice book, yet it was full of anticipation. Griet, the main character was very interesting and I found myself staring at the painting on the front cover and wondering if I could see the Griet, whose mind I had read in her eyes. I found that I could, this book gave me a new appreciation for a painting which I had always liked, but now find that I love.
The relationship between her and Vermeer was tenuous and filled with fleeting glances. There's a lot of forbidden love but mixed into a real life situation which adds finality to the book. I can't explain my love for this book without giving away a heap of spoilers, but it's safe to say that this is one of my favourites.
Part two:
The movie... *sigh,* I wasn't expecting much when I started this movie and after watching the trailer I had set my expectations even lower, with hope that it would somewhat impress me. But when you skip the first half of the book and cut out major characters? that's where I draw the line.
This movie wanted so badly to get to the "real" plot line that it skipped over the build up. It didn't give any insight into Griet's personality and if you had never read the book, you wouldn't understand the way she thinks at all. The plot line focused so much on the romance, that it brought the movie down.
I had wondered how they were going to make a movie of a book where the main character is so internalised and they did not do it well. As much as I loved Scarlett Johansson in The Avengers I feel like she didn't quite pull off the depth this character had, the depth the painting has. She lacked those emotions and values that are so integral to Griet and only focussed on how ladies at the time would have acted in regard to men, rather than how Griet acted.
The only highlight of the movie was Colin Firth as Vermeer, although I have to admit that I am biased when it comes to Colin Firth (be still my beating heart), but while he almost seemed too young for the role, he did seem to capture some of his character's sardonic nature and intense feelings.
Overall I wouldn't recommend the movie, especially if you have read the book, it only leads to disappointment and bafflement at the spoiled plot. Plus the skipped a significant part of the ending.
If you would like the Goodreads link to the book click here
So part one:
When I was in year eight, my english teacher came up to me during a period called Wider Reading (basically a lesson spent getting books suggested to us and then choosing a book and reading for the rest of the lesson). My teacher approached me and took me to the senior fiction and pulled out a stack of books for me to read. One of them was Girl with a Pearl Earring, sadly I made the unfortunate decision to read the book Possession by A. S. Byatt first, not a great decision on my part as this book put me off all books of that nature. I gave up after about 300 pages on snail paced supposed romance. I then made an even worse by my choosing Wuthering Heights as my next book (one of the most depressing novels I have ever in my life attempted to read) and soon gave up after about 200 pages.
Sadly, I never decided to read Girl with a Pearl Earring that year, but perhaps it was a good thing because I'm not sure I would have enjoyed it the same way if I had read when I was fourteen.
When I picked up this book again from my school library I was looking for something "literary," I felt like something that would challenge me a little, but still something I would enjoy. So I chose that book, and surprising I really enjoyed it.
The story line was gentle, it was nice book, yet it was full of anticipation. Griet, the main character was very interesting and I found myself staring at the painting on the front cover and wondering if I could see the Griet, whose mind I had read in her eyes. I found that I could, this book gave me a new appreciation for a painting which I had always liked, but now find that I love.
The relationship between her and Vermeer was tenuous and filled with fleeting glances. There's a lot of forbidden love but mixed into a real life situation which adds finality to the book. I can't explain my love for this book without giving away a heap of spoilers, but it's safe to say that this is one of my favourites.
Part two:
The movie... *sigh,* I wasn't expecting much when I started this movie and after watching the trailer I had set my expectations even lower, with hope that it would somewhat impress me. But when you skip the first half of the book and cut out major characters? that's where I draw the line.
This movie wanted so badly to get to the "real" plot line that it skipped over the build up. It didn't give any insight into Griet's personality and if you had never read the book, you wouldn't understand the way she thinks at all. The plot line focused so much on the romance, that it brought the movie down.
I had wondered how they were going to make a movie of a book where the main character is so internalised and they did not do it well. As much as I loved Scarlett Johansson in The Avengers I feel like she didn't quite pull off the depth this character had, the depth the painting has. She lacked those emotions and values that are so integral to Griet and only focussed on how ladies at the time would have acted in regard to men, rather than how Griet acted.
The only highlight of the movie was Colin Firth as Vermeer, although I have to admit that I am biased when it comes to Colin Firth (be still my beating heart), but while he almost seemed too young for the role, he did seem to capture some of his character's sardonic nature and intense feelings.
Overall I wouldn't recommend the movie, especially if you have read the book, it only leads to disappointment and bafflement at the spoiled plot. Plus the skipped a significant part of the ending.
If you would like the Goodreads link to the book click here
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Work Experience and a Small Portion of My Growth as a Person
For most of my life I wanted to be a vet (except for those
brief years as a very young child where my aim in life was to be a zoo keeper
by day and rock star by night.) and when I say wanted to be a vet, I was
serious; I had all my VCE subjects planned out by year five and what uni
courses I was going to take and what my ATAR needed to be (99.2, whew, I aimed
high.) So it was kind of inconvenient
when at the beginning of year nine, I finally admitted to myself that maybe I
didn’t want to be a vet anymore.
You have no idea how much this decision annoyed me; I mean I
had my entire life planned out. I knew exactly what I wanted to do and what my
path was to get there in doing it. The most annoying aspect of all of it was
that up until that moment I had never had to worry about my future (I strongly
believed that 99.2 was highly achievable)and now I had no idea.
Naturally after that I went through a range of different
options, some of which included: soldier, army doctor, army psychologist,
medical researcher(I wanted to cure cancer for a while there), doctor, national
geographic journalist, author, writer, CEO of a large corporation, Prime
Minister of Australia, engineer mechanic.
Then I looked back on all these things I wanted to be and I realised
that they all (all the ones I really considered anyway) involved helping
people. And that, my friends, was my Eureka* moment. That was the moment when I
realised that what I wanted to do was help things, whether it be people or
animals, or the environment. All I wanted was to have someone somewhere have a
better life because of something I did or something that I helped to do. Then
came a new list of things I wanted to do, I wanted to be teacher in the
Taliban, UN lobbyist, Aid worker, Humanitarian, reporter on topics surround
third world countries, I wanted to fight alongside Malala for the right to an
education everywhere and for everyone.
So, this was great, I
knew what I wanted to do, I was so passionate about it(still am) and yet… I had
no idea how to get there. There are, surprisingly, no courses in universities
called “helping people,” trust me I know.
So then flash forward to the first
information session about work experience and at first I was excited, I would
go to charity and I would ask questions and I would find out exactly what I
needed to do. Until I started researching and quickly discovered that their
didn’t seem to be a single charity organisation in Australia that offered work
experience. This was, to say the least, a disappointment. All that hope, all
those emotions came crashing back down and I started my spiral:
Then it happened, my mum’s best friend, or my godmother was
over at my house and talking about how her, very lovely niece, was doing an
internship at World Vision Australia, and BOOM I was in… well it didn't exactly
happen that fast there was some texts, paper work and emails that had to be
sorted but for the sake of this story I’m going to edit those bits out.
So, skip ahead a few months and DOUBLE BOOM first day of
work experience, to say I was excited was an understatement. My first day of
work experience was actually the last day of a national tour that my world
vision contact/supervisor/person-who-got-me-the-position-and-who-I-was-going-to-stalk-for-a-week,
( I know what you’re thinking, that was waaaay too many hyphens, let’s just
call her Jas)was running.
It was a training
session for VGenners on child labour, and the #FreeTo campaign. I suggest you
look it up, it’s pretty awesome. Anyway it was pretty intense and my brain
almost went into information overload mode, long story short did you know that
there are 168 million child labourers in the world, and that the G20 conference
can do something to change that? I didn't. And our ability to influence and
make real change in the world kind of blew my mind, late I would realise that
many things would blow my mind that week.)
The second day was my first day in the office and Jas was
away, (she’d just been traveling and working for ages, I think she deserved a
break) so I was assigned to Ian, a funny guy that seems to know the entire
office by name (something I admire, since I forget people’s names as soon as
they introduce themselves to me, thank god all the desks at World Vision have
the person’s name on them!) then after going to Devotions, which Ian ran and
was really good. I met a bunch of really welcoming people and shook a lot of
hands and then was whisked away on tour of the office. Which after being shown
around I realised that not getting lost was futile. So I stalked Ian for the
day, well I’m sure there’s a better word for it then that but I can’t think of
it. I learned a lot and the mind blow moment came when Ian was sorting through
some paper work and he said it was so a Refugee in Malaysia could come to
Australia… that what he was doing was affecting real people in real situations.
Day three and Jas was back so I spent the morning typing out
post-it-notes, before being locked out of my computer and unable to get back in
since Jas was at a meeting. So after about ten minutes of waiting and sitting
trying to look busy, I was back to stalking Ian and it was pretty fun trying to
convince the entire of World Vision to go to the movies with free movie
vouchers that expired that night, hence my friends and I went to see Jersey Boys (surprisingly good if you're interested).
Work the next day was good, I typed out posters for the morning on an iPad and by the last poster I could type without looking. A major achievement in life I think, that afternoon I went off to a school to do a sim, short for simulation. Where Soreti and Kate and I were going to pretend to be slave owners and force a year eight class to make match boxes... they had no idea and were terrified... it was fantastic.
So flash forward to now, it's my last day at World Vision and I've had the best time and I kind of don't want to leave. There's something in the atmosphere here, and everyone cares so much and is so passionate and it's so refreshing to be away from a classroom full of people who shrug their shoulders and say "Oh well, that's sad. But what can you do?"
Well, now I know the answer, there's a whole hell of a lot you can do, join the 40 Hour Famine, find a local VGen group. We can do so much and we can make a difference, and dispite what people think here is SO much behind the scenes work that goes on. There are thousands of people everyday working against injustice and even though I've just had a small taste of what it's like I think I'm going to keep coming back for seconds... and thirds... and fourths... and fifths... and just more.
*Reference to John Green’s fabulous novel An Abundance of Katherines, just for
those of you who might have picked up on it, I will write a review of it and
add it to my blog at a later date.
Labels:
#FreeTo,
ATAR,
blog,
book,
career,
diary,
dreams,
growth,
happy,
indecision,
jobs,
John Green,
mind blowing,
subjects,
thinking,
VCE,
VGen,
Work Experience,
World Vision,
writing
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
BOOK REVIEW: Slated
Book: Slated
Author: Teri Terry
I am a sucker for a good romance. I always have been, and I probably always will be. There is something about romance novels that have me rolling all over my bed squealing with delight as the characters confess their love and affections.
Slated, however, is not a romance. Sure there are defiantly some romantic aspects to it, but it's not the main story line. And guess what? I still loved it, (and that's saying something for me). I loved it so much that I couldn't stop reading it. My finger quickly turned the pages as I became more and more enthralled with the characters and a story line so gripping it feels as if it will choke you.I had all but given up on dystopians when I read this one, (it's one of my problem with publishing companies; when something sells they only sell that until everyone is sick to death of it). This dystopian was different. It held interesting new ideas that I hadn't read about before.
In the book criminals under the age of sixteen are "slated" meaning that all their memories are wiped and they have to learn everything again and are assigned to a new family. Kyla, the main character, is Slated. But she is smart and I absolutely ADORE it when the main character is smart and is figuring out the plot at the same pace as you.
This book is a page turner right until the last page... and then you start the second book. (I'll save you the worry of it being a bad sequel... it's good too)
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
Things to do instead of Writers block
I am a self-admitted victim to the toils of writers block. So I decided to make a list of things to do instead of staring, mindlessly at a computer with a cursor that blinks mockingly in my face.
So here is my list (that largley invloves many forms of procrastination):
- write something, anything, that is completely different.
- bake cookies.
- watch vloggers on YouTube.
- Burn cookies.
- watch celebrity talk shows on YouTube.
- Eat cookies anyway.
- Read fanfiction.
- clean desk.
- reorganise desk
- clean wardrobe.
- throw out practically all your clothes (none of them fit you anymore)
- Rearrange clothes according to colour and type of clothing (cause we all like pretty rainbows in our cupboards.)
- find homework.
- stare at homework intently.
- give up on homework and go back to whatever you are trying to write.
- Stare at blinking cursor.
- write a bunch of swear words about how you hate your life.
- Play Octagon (in case you don't know what this magnificent game is, oh I can't be bothered telling you, just get it, its great).
- Make meringues because you only need two ingredients (1 cup sugar, 4 egg whites, whisk together until stiff peaks form, blob on trays and cook in a preheated oven at 225 degrees for 30-40 minutes)
- google the longest german word and try to memorise it (btw its 'Donaudampfschiffahrtsgesellschaftskapitän')
So, there you go. There is 20 things to do when you have writers block. Hopefully by the end of it, you have thought of something else to write.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


